Final cut pro x 10.3.1 apple mac pro el capitan issues

#Final cut pro x 10.3.1 apple mac pro el capitan issues movie#
#Final cut pro x 10.3.1 apple mac pro el capitan issues 1080p#

Export the QuickTime movie by choosing вЂњFile:Share:Master FileвЂ¦вЂ™Д¦. Click the new вЂBruceX Test вЂ“ 5K вЂ project timeline (this makes the Share command selectable)ДҐ. Open the BruceX.fcpbundle library which contains a very short but complex 5K project.Д¤. In Final Cut Pro, go to вЂFinal Cut Pro:PreferencesвЂ¦вЂ™ вЂ“ in the Playback tab make sure вЂBackground renderвЂ™ is off.ДЈ. Have both QuickTime Player and Final Cut Pro open at the same time.Дў. вЂ¦and time the export of a 5K master file from the timeline. To use this, open the Final Cut Pro library at The Bruce X benchmark is based on timing how long a Mac configuration takes to export the project. As it uses many layers of complex content, it requires lots of GPU RAM. It uses standard Final Cut generators, titles and transitions. It creates a very short timeline at a high resolution: 5120 by 2700 (at 23.975 fps). IвЂ™ve come up with a test that shows the differences between these GPUs and other MacsвЂ¦ The BruceX benchmarkД«ruceX is a small Final Cut Pro X XML file that you import into Final Cut Pro. MacBook Pro late-2013 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 1GB 19.2 seconds MacBook Pro late-2013 Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB 18.8 seconds It turns out that the test wasnвЂ™t tough enough to show a difference between the two GPUs: Over at the the FCP.co forum, qbe asked me to do the вЂFar Far AwayвЂ™В test on my new late 2013 MacBook Pro 15вЂі using only the built-in Iris Pro Graphics and also on only theВ Discrete GeForce GT 750M GPU which I included in my BTO Mac.

This test puts enough pressure on main memory and GPU memory to separate older generation Macs from more recent computers.

#Final cut pro x 10.3.1 apple mac pro el capitan issues 1080p#

The Intel Iris and Iris Pro are every bit the match or master of discrete NVIDIA Mobile GPUs - at least when it comes to OpenCL acceleration.ДЄlthough it is great news that integrated GPUs are getting better, many are worried that the MacBook Pros should be avoided until Iris Pro has improved a little more.ДЄ speed test proposed by FCP.co was to time the render of Final Cut Pro XвЂ™s built-in вЂFar Far AwayвЂ™ title on a 23.975 1080p timeline. In the past we sneered at the integrated GPUs and their puny performance. Editors want to know if the integrated Intel Iris and Iris Pro Graphics GPUs are powerful enough to run professional software well.Д®arly testing shows that Iris Pro graphics are better than many expected. New Mac software is depending more and more on GPU power. To help people work out which Macs work best with Final Cut Pro X, it is useful to refer to a standard speed test.ДЄll but one of the MacBook Pros with RetinaВ configurations do not have dedicated GPUs. BruceX: Try this new Final Cut Pro X benchmark